Kia Ora Kids in Albany

ERO assessed this home-based service as Not well placed in June 2018. Our analysis of the ERO report identified good practice across curriculum and learning, children's wellbeing, whānau partnership, and health and safety, though the overall placement indicates concerns requiring attention.

Roll 60

Kia ora Kids at Home Childcare 5

ERO assessed this home-based service as Not well placed in 2018. Our analysis of the ERO report found strengths in curriculum planning, children's wellbeing monitoring, family communication, and health and safety compliance (B grades), but identified bicultural practice as an area requiring development (C grade). The service has a current roll of 80 children.

Roll 80

Kia ora Kids at Home Childcare 3

ERO assessed this home-based service as Not well placed in June 2017. Our analysis of the ERO report identified strengths in curriculum and learning, children's wellbeing, and leadership, but noted areas requiring development in whānau partnership, bicultural practice, and health and safety compliance.

Roll 80

Kia ora Kids at Home Childcare 6

ERO assessed this home-based service as Not well placed in its 2020 review. Our analysis of the ERO report identified concerns across several areas: Health & safety received a D grade with multiple non-compliances requiring urgent attention; Curriculum & learning, Whānau partnership, and Bicultural practice all received C grades, indicating development needs in structured assessment, parent communication, and te reo Māori confidence. Children's wellbeing was assessed as B.

Roll 60

Kia ora Kids at Home Childcare 1

ERO assessed this home-based service as Not well placed in February 2021. Our analysis of the ERO report found strengths in curriculum and learning (B), whānau partnership (B), health and safety (B), and leadership (B), while bicultural practice (C) was identified as an area requiring further development.

Roll 80

Kia ora Kids at Home Childcare 2

ERO assessed this home-based service as Not well placed in 2021. Our analysis of the ERO report identified strengths in curriculum and learning (grade B), health and safety systems (grade B), and leadership support (grade B), while bicultural practice was identified as a key area for development (grade C).

Roll 60

Alternative centres in Albany

8 other licensed ECE centres in Albany from different operators.

ERO assessed BestStart Albany 1 as Not well placed. Our analysis of the ERO report found the service demonstrated deliberate, interest-responsive curriculum approaches with good progress tracking (B grade), but bicultural practice was still developing with emerging practices (C grade). Leadership was collaborative with a developing professional learning culture (B grade).

Roll 35

Fun Place Childcare Rosedale

ERO assessed Fun Place Childcare Rosedale as Not well placed in their March 2019 review. Our analysis of the ERO report identified strengths in curriculum and learning, whānau partnership, health and safety, and leadership and governance, with bicultural practice in developing stages.

Roll 148

BestStart Albany 2

BestStart Educare

ERO assessed BestStart Albany 2 as Not well placed in November 2018. Our analysis of the ERO report found the service effective in curriculum and learning, and in supporting children's wellbeing, but identified bicultural practice as an area for development.

Roll 50

Albany Community Preschool

Roll 40

BestStart North Harbour

BestStart Educare

ERO assessed BestStart North Harbour as Not well placed in its 2017 review. Our analysis of the ERO report identified strengths in curriculum and learning, bicultural practice, and leadership and governance across the centre's operations.

Roll 58

Kristin School Kindergarten