Skip to content
d daycarenearme.co.nz

Te Kōhanga Reo o Kerepehi

Te Kōhanga Reo

Mcgowan Avenue, Ngatea · Hauraki District

Te Kōhanga Reo o Kerepehi had an ERO review in January 2021. Our analysis of the ERO report identified significant concerns in whānau partnership and leadership & governance (both D grades), and notable gaps in curriculum & learning and children's wellbeing (both C grades). Bicultural practice and health & safety were assessed as meeting expectations (B grades).

AI-generated summary of this centre's ERO review data — verify against the ERO report below. How summaries are generated.

Total roll
19
2025
Under 2s
20 Hours ECE
MOE #
35007

Roll breakdown

By age

By ethnicity

Note: a child may be counted under multiple ethnicities (total may exceed roll).

Cultural & rohe

ERO review

Education Review · 2021-01-20

Review is 5 years old. ERO reassesses most services on a 3-year cycle, so a current review is likely in progress or recently due. Per-dimension grades below reflect this review's prose — they're useful as historical context but the centre's current quality may differ.
Daycare Near Me's analysis of the ERO report — six dimensions with verbatim quotes (methodology).
Curriculum & learning
C
"Some aspects of the programme are less planned and coordinated. This is resulting in kaimahi needing to manage mokopuna behaviour. More interesting and stimulating activities are needed to ensure mokopuna are engaged in positive learning experiences."

Planning and coordination lacking; behaviour management issues; insufficient engaging activities.

Children's wellbeing
C
"Some examples of mokopuna who are happy and engaged in their learning are evident."

Limited evidence of consistent happiness and engagement; only some examples noted.

Whānau partnership
D
"While assessment practices are in place, these provide limited detail for whānau to understand how well their mokopuna are learning. Kaiako reports to hui whānau are verbal only. Although kaimahi meet to discuss the programme, these conversations are not documented. Support is required for all aspects of the planning and assessment. Mokopuna learning is compromised, and their strengths and interests are not being effectively catered for."

Assessment reporting minimal; verbal reports only; no documentation; whānau lack understanding of learning.

Bicultural practice
B
"Mokopuna are immersed in an environment where te reo Māori is valued. Kaimahi have strategies in place to develop te reo Māori for mokopuna. These include karakia, himene, mihimihi and waiata. Mokopuna have opportunities to lead different aspects of the programme. Babies mimic basic words. Older mokopuna respond positively to the modelling of te reo by kaimahi. Mokopuna are developing as speakers of te reo Māori."

Te reo Māori valued and embedded; effective strategies evident; children developing as speakers.

Health & safety
B
"Some aspects of whānau management are in place. All health and safety registers are current and emergency evacuation procedures are carried out regularly."

Registers current and procedures regularly conducted; management aspects in place.

Leadership & governance
D
"Internal evaluation requires development. A review of the charter, policies and procedures is overdue. There is minimal reporting across operations. Administration duties are carried out. However, further clarity about roles and responsibilities is needed. Personnel documentation requires attention. Some kaimahi contracts are not signed. Not all kaimahi have job descriptions. Appraisals are noted as completed but are not dated. There is no annual plan to ensure key operational tasks are managed in a timely manner. Mokopuna are not well supported by whānau whakahaere."

Internal evaluation underdeveloped; overdue charter review; unclear roles; incomplete personnel files; no annual plan.

Source: Education Review Office review of Te Kōhanga Reo o Kerepehi dated 2021-01-20, licensed CC-BY 4.0. The 4-point overall judgement is ERO's; the 6 dimension grades are our analysis of ERO's prose (see methodology). · Centre has 2 individual reviews on file — showing most recent.

Composite score

How this is computed
50 / 100 Compared against EQI unknown
Curriculum
20%
Grade C · bottom 10% of band (n=2425)
50
Wellbeing
20%
Grade C · bottom 10% of band (n=1871)
50
Health & Safety
20%
Grade B · bottom quartile of band (n=2319)
70
Leadership
15%
Grade D · bottom 10% of band (n=2400)
25
Whānau Partnership
12.5%
Grade D · bottom 10% of band (n=1880)
25
Bicultural Practice
12.5%
Grade B · near band median (n=2375)
70

The composite is a weighted average of six ERO dimensions, each scored 0–100 (A=90, B=70, C=50, D=25). The "(p47)" style suffix shows where the centre sits within its EQI band (peer percentile, when ≥10 comparable centres in band). See methodology for the formula + limits.

Location

Mcgowan Avenue, Ngatea. Nearby centres marked in grey — click to navigate.

Open in Google Maps →

Map tiles © OpenStreetMap, © CARTO · Brand-teal pin = this centre, 800m radius shown

Loading Ngatea context…

Frequently asked

Is Te Kōhanga Reo o Kerepehi a free kindergarten?
Te Kōhanga Reo o Kerepehi is a Te Kōhanga Reo service. 20 Hours ECE applies for 3-5 year olds at participating centres.
What's the roll at Te Kōhanga Reo o Kerepehi?
19 children attend Te Kōhanga Reo o Kerepehi (roll year 2025).
Where is Te Kōhanga Reo o Kerepehi?
Mcgowan Avenue Ngatea Hauraki District

How much will this cost you? Use our FamilyBoost + Childcare Subsidy calculator to estimate your weekly out-of-pocket after government support.

Nearby & related

Compare Te Kōhanga Reo o Kerepehi side-by-side with another centre →

s
When they start school

Find your zoned schools near Ngatea

Our sister site schoolsnearme.co.nz covers every NZ primary, intermediate and secondary school with ERO reports, financials, and statutory-manager alerts. Enter your address to see which schools you're zoned for.

schoolsnearme.co.nz →

Sources & verification

Every fact on this page links back to its government source. Verify directly:

Full source list, licence text, refresh cadence: /sources. How we match, clean, and rank: /methodology.

Data sources & freshness (4 sources · last refresh 12 July 2026)

Service type, address, roll, ethnicity, Equity Index, 20 Hours, Takiwā, lat/lng

As of: Roll year 2025· Refresh: Nightly source · re-pulled on every deploy

Annual financial returns (community-based + umbrella orgs)

As of: 545 centres covered· Refresh: Annual filings · re-ingested with each refresh

Per-centre review reports + 6-dimension letter grades (curriculum / wellbeing / whānau / bicultural / health & safety / leadership)

As of: 10,663 reports / 4,194 centres · latest review 2026-05-18· Refresh: On review publication · CC-BY 4.0 attribution

Safety score, crime/1k, 2023 Census demographics

As of: 2023 Census· Refresh: Quarterly police data · 5-yearly census

Last build refresh: . See full methodology + data sources pages for licences, refresh cadences, and known gaps.