Kids at Home

ERO assessed Kids at Home Hamilton 2 as Not well placed in January 2021. Our analysis of the ERO report shows strength in curriculum and learning (B grade) and bicultural practice (B grade), with educators promoting Māori language and culture. Whānau partnership was identified as requiring development (C grade), with parent engagement highlighted as a priority for improvement.

Kids at Home Hamilton 4

ERO assessed Kids at Home Hamilton 4 as Not well placed in January 2021. Our analysis of the ERO report found the service received a B grade for Curriculum & learning, with interests-led learning observed and visiting teacher support noted. Whānau partnership was graded C, with ERO identifying inconsistent partnerships and recommending reinstatement of parent surveys as a priority.

Roll 80

Kids at Home The Bay 1

ERO assessed Kids at Home The Bay 1 as Not well placed in January 2021. Our analysis of the ERO report found strengths in curriculum implementation, children's wellbeing, and health and safety systems, but identified whānau partnership as an area requiring development.

Kids at Home The Bay 2

ERO assessed Kids at Home The Bay 2 as Not well placed in its 2021 review. Our analysis of the ERO report found the service received B grades for curriculum and learning, children's wellbeing, bicultural practice, and health and safety, but a C grade for whānau partnership, where communication systems were identified as needing strengthening.

Kids at Home The Bay 3

ERO assessed Kids at Home The Bay 3 as Not well placed in their October 2021 review. Our analysis of the ERO report found strengths in curriculum implementation and health and safety practices, while whānau partnership and bicultural practice were identified as areas requiring development.

Kids at Home The Bay 5

ERO assessed this home-based service as Not well placed in January 2021. Our analysis of the ERO report identified strengths in curriculum and learning, children's wellbeing, and health and safety systems, while whānau partnership was graded as requiring development, particularly in parent feedback mechanisms.